Wisconsin Assembly to pass Republican bill banning race, diversity factors in financial aid for UW

SCOTT BAUER Associated Press

(Pxjere)

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Republican-controlled Wisconsin Assembly was scheduled to pass a bill Tuesday that would ban Universities of Wisconsin officials from considering race and diversity when awarding state-funded financial aid.

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers is expected to veto the measure. He’s also expected to veto another bill up for passage Tuesday in the Assembly that would withhold state grants from schools that repeatedly violate free speech rights on campus.

GOP lawmakers have long accused colleges of suppressing conservative viewpoints. UW lobbyist Jeff Buhrandt testified against the measure last month, saying many of the requirements are already in practice and putting them into law would remove flexibility to ensure free speech is protected. He also said that the penalties could reduce financial aid given to students, penalizing them for actions beyond their control.

The proposal barring the consideration of race and diversity when awarding financial aid comes months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that universities cannot consider race in the admissions process. That decision did not reference or apply to financial aid, but some lawmakers have still used it to justify scaling back race-based financial aid.

Republicans in at least a dozen states have introduced legislation this year targeting diversity, equity and inclusion programs in higher education. In Wisconsin, GOP lawmakers slashed the university system’s budget by $32 million in June and have withheld pay raises for UW employees until school officials agree to cut spending on so-called DEI efforts by that amount.

The Assembly was also slated to pass a bill that would guarantee admission to UW-Madison for any high school graduate ranked in the top 5% of their class. Anyone ranked in the top 10% would be guaranteed admission to any UW system school, except the flagship campus in Madison.

UW-Madison is against the measure, saying in submitted testimony that the proposal is “unworkable” and “does not serve our state or our shared goals.”

All three of the bills would have to pass the Senate before going to Evers for his likely vetoes.

———————