A Minnesota woman is accused of turning in a ballot for her dead mother. A routine check caught it

ABSTRACT: A northern Minnesota woman accused of trying to submit a mail ballot for her recently deceased mother has been charged with three felonies. The case shows how routine safeguards thwart rare instances of attempted election fraud. Itasca County officials said Monday that the improper vote was caught because the state provides a monthly list of people who’ve died to election officials. The woman returned ballots for her and her mother in early October, and the county office overseeing local elections quickly verified that the mother had died in August. A court filing says the woman told an investigator that her mother was an ardent supporter of former President Donald Trump who wanted to vote for him before she died.

A northern Minnesota woman accused of trying to submit a mail ballot for her recently deceased mother has been charged with three felonies, showing how routine election safeguards thwart rare instances of attempted voter fraud.

Officials in Itasca County, about 200 miles (322 kilometers) north of Minneapolis, said Monday that the improper vote was caught because the state provides a monthly list of people who’ve died to election officials, who then flag those names in the state’s voter registration database. The woman returned ballots for herself and her mother in early October, and the county auditor’s office, which oversees local elections, quickly verified that the mother had died at the end of August, almost three weeks before it began mailing out absentee ballots.

The criminal case was filed last week in state district court in Grand Rapids as former President Donald Trump continued to suggest he will lose the Nov. 5 election only if his political opponents cheat. There was no evidence of significant voter fraud in the 2020 election, which Trump lost, and there is no evidence Trump’s adversaries can or will rig this year’s election.

The woman told a sheriff’s lieutenant in an interview that she filled out her mother’s ballot after her mother’s death, according to a probable cause statement filed with the district court. The statement said the woman was an “ardent” Trump supporter who had wanted to vote for him before she died.
Itasca County Attorney Jake Fauchald said the case shows election officials can catch problems and even rural counties have the resources and willingness to prosecute election fraud. Itasca County has about 45,000 residents.

“It was flagged almost immediately,” Fauchald said. “We do have ways of catching and flagging these fraudulent ballots and we’re going to do something about it so that those ballots don’t get through.”
The woman’s first court appearance is set for Dec. 4. She is charged with one count of illegal voting and two counts of making or signing a false certificate, accused of forging her mother’s signature, both on the mother’s ballot envelope, and as a witness on her own. Each charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.

It was not clear whether the woman has an attorney, and 10 telephone listings for her online were out of service. She did not immediately respond Monday to a Facebook message seeking comment.
Fauchald said it’s the county’s first case involving voter fraud during the current election cycle.
An Associated Press investigation of the 2020 election explored every potential case of voter fraud in the six battleground states disputed by Trump and found there were fewer than 475 out of millions of votes cast, not enough to tip the outcome. Democrat Joe Biden won the six states by a combined 311,257 votes.

In Minnesota, Itasca County Auditor Austin Rohling said he hasn’t seen a “nefarious” case of someone casting a ballot for a dead person in his nearly two years in office. He said occasionally, someone fills out a ballot, returns it and then dies before Election Day. In that case, it isn’t counted under Minnesota law.
Sixteen other states prohibit counting ballots cast by someone who subsequently dies before the election, but 10 states specifically allow it. The law is silent in the rest of the country, according to research by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Rohling said that “strange things happen” in elections “on an extremely minor level,” but very few of those incidents involve intentional fraud.

“The system’s working the way it should,” Rohling said.